• SibLINGSHOT

dry goods: reconstituted animals, thin white rope


down in the desert: dust bowl, dallas, texas; 1936.

What a strangely still hollow of quiet today has idled by in, coming after yesterday\’s unintentional flurry of activity. It is now approaching 11.30 in the evening and I am struggling, readers, to dredge up the ounce of motivation required to all but throw together some token post. I woke up this morning and brooded over those comments which continued to trickle in after Sunday\’s unexpected influx. In all truth I was expecting to suffer at least some slings and arrows after my posting from Pink Floyds\’s \”Animals\” in the ill-considered flush of a final weekend binge.

Matt seemingly broached the subject, quite legitimately I felt, with a pithy one-liner in the mid afternoon: \”Ain\’t but one cure for hydrophobia…\” Indeed. Naturally, I assumed he meant euthanise the rabid cur, given the post was given over to the seventeen minute \’opus\’, \”Dogs\”. Jon had tackled me previously on the very nature of the exhaustive epic, nodding \”hippie\” jam with a similarly reasonable raising of eyebrows, and with that in mind I cracked my knuckles resignedly and set to stabbing away at the keyboard with one arthritic finger and the agitated righteousness of one whose duty it is to inveigle and beguile.

Well, it would seem my eagerness to explain was premature. One hour later, and reading back a horrendously conflated comment possessing all the charm of an insipid first-year undergraduate\’s essay cum virtual thesis, Matt dropped by once more to inform me that no, his earlier comment had not been intentionally veiled or barbed after all. I looked at the picture illustrating Sunday\’s post. Those goddamn wolves appeared to be genuinely sniggering at me, all right, their long snouts twisted sardonically as the howling choked and died in their throats. Here\’s my original long-winded rebuttal. It saves me from the tedium of wrestling with unvetted demons.


\”Ha! I take it you refuse to confess the faintest degree of admiration for this incarnation of the Floyd, then ? Or are you referring to my line about keeping the dogs on a leash ? I\’ll put my money on the former.Well, it\’s a funny thing. I openly despised this album on release. It seemed the very definition of those pricks punk rock biblically engaged in kicking against. Turgid and overblown ; hopelessly pompous and self-regarding. In short, onanistic wank. And yet.

Here I am, a little more than thirty years later, and it would be churlish – grossly hypocritical – if I were to profess to still cleave to the dogma of old while secretly harbouring a grudging respect for this choice morsel of progressive tomfoolery. I like this LP.

There it is, I\’ve finally admitted this mild herecy. Publicly, after decades of determinedly lambasting messrs Waters, Gilmour, Wright and Mason through the long dark years following the transmogrification of Syd Barrett into stuttering court jester and sacrificial lamb. It has been a long fraught and often bitterly waged campaign. You may well accuse me of having slipped unconscionably into flaccid decrepitude at the very last hurdle ; one more drooling casualty as the medics field-dress the dead. You may even be right. \”Animals\”, I think, is the last album of any merit the post-Barrett Pink Floyd would undertake. Sure, it\’s ridiculously grandiose in its intention to further conceptualize the basic premise of \”Atom Heart Mother\”, but compare it to their next LP, \”The Wall\” and it holds its ground quite remarkably as a cornerstone of well produced restraint. The instrumentation and writing throughout is pleasant and noodly – perfectly in-keeping with the fashion for worthy older farts of their day – and while its potential to succeed is admittedly clouded by its simplistic themes of man\’s inherent animal nature, it goes a fair way in maintaining the innocuous level of navel-gazing first perpetuated by \”The Dark Side Of The Moon\”.

I\’m surprised to have found I\’ve played this album in its entirety on more occasions than i\’d wish to admit; I\’ve caught myself tapping a foot wholly unconsciously while sipping a nicely beaded chilled beer or Pinot Blanc and fantasizing about \”retiring to the South of France\” with all the trappings of worldly success I\’ve thus far somehow nakedly failed to obtain. If you unwittingly hanker after some easy listening while chasing a tan on a private beach, you could do far worse. It\’s as close to a pleasantly indulged mid-life crisis as I\’m ever liable to get.

If you\’ve made it all the way down here to the bitter dregs of this rustled post, you may be expecting me to serve you up a cold dish of \”Pigs On The Wing\”. Some mutton dressed as lamb. Well, I have managed to restore a little dignity to these events ; to rein in the invective while keeping one last joke up my sleeve.

Just in case you really cannot bear to net the issue of low tide\’s last gasp, here\’s something completely different. I\’ve even cheated a little and posted this one on the first draft\’s timeline. Just so\’s I make that fucking Monday deadline.

Guy Kyser\’s Thin White Rope are a different breed of animal entirely. I\’ve been threatening to unleash them on you all for some time now. Enjoy.

THIN WHITE ROPE: WIRE ANIMALS from \”Moonhead\” LP (Frontier) 1987 (US)

THIN WHITE ROPE: THING from \”Moonhead\” LP (Frontier) 1987 (US) THIN WHITE ROPE: MOONHEAD from \”Moonhead\” LP (Frontier) 1987 (US) MOONHEAD RE-WAXED

#19771987

1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

punishment exercise, weblog version

Hello. I am still breathing, if you wondered at this latest absence. I needed to step back from the drop awhile, the empty space between the rails, to let the game play out. It has not been pretty for